The Vulnerability Economy
Vulnerability has become social currency.
The more vulnerable you are, the more attention you get. But only if you’re in the “socially approved” marginalized groups.
Vulnerability becomes power. And elites across the political spectrum exploit it.
Consider what happened after Hurricane Helene. White nationalist groups like Active Clubs and Patriot Front showed up in devastated North Carolina communities with chainsaws and supplies.
They helped. They filmed it. And they changed minds.
The Aid Paradox
The 60 Minutes segment that aired in May 2026 showed something most people didn’t expect. White nationalist groups rolled into Hurricane Helene communities with chainsaws, generators, and supplies.
Robert Rundo, one of the leaders, didn’t hide what they were doing. They were there to help, but also to film it, to build relationships, and to change minds.
“That’s the guy who came when my house was on fire,” Rundo said, describing how disaster victims remember who showed up.
He’s right. When FEMA is slow, when the government fumbles the response, when official channels fail, whoever shows up with a chainsaw and a willing hand gets remembered. Gets trusted. Gets legitimacy.
The groups targeted mostly white rural areas. They framed their work as “helping our people.” They openly criticized government inefficiency while spreading conspiracy theories about FEMA. They avoided coordination with authorities. They built what they call “pro-white parallel systems.”
And they documented everything for social media, content that softens their image from “hate group” to “the ones who actually care.”
The disaster victims face an impossible moral trap. The state abandoned them. Their neighbors couldn’t handle the scale of destruction alone.
Then these guys show up, guys with swastika tattoos and ethno-nationalist manifestos, and they clear the fallen trees, hand out food, rebuild what was broken. How do you condemn someone who just saved your home? How do you reject help when you’re desperate?
That’s the game. Real aid buys real legitimacy.
Once you’ve accepted the help, once you’ve shaken the hand and felt the gratitude, it’s harder to call them what they are. The goodness of the action contaminates your ability to see the ideology clearly. They know it. That’s why they do it.
How the Game Works
This isn’t unique to white nationalists. It’s a universal tactic. It works the same way across the ideological spectrum.
The formula is simple: find vulnerable people, provide real help or perform real grievance, position yourself as their protector, and leverage that relationship for loyalty, recruitment, or moral capital.
Progressive movements do it by framing systemic oppression as perpetual vulnerability, generating donations, policy wins, and social immunity from criticism. Religious charities do it with conditional aid.
Everyone’s playing the same game because the incentives align: attention, funding, power, and the loyalty of people who are genuinely suffering.
The aid is often real. The help is often needed.
But it’s never just help. It’s always conditional, on adopting the worldview, on joining the narrative, on becoming part of the in-group. Vulnerability becomes the contested territory. The people who are actually vulnerable become the prize.
The Marketplace of Suffering
Truly vulnerable people have become a marketplace. Different groups compete for their loyalty by offering different packages of aid and ideology.
Extremist mutual aid offers in-group solidarity and anti-establishment framing. “The government doesn’t care about you. We do. We’re your people.”
It’s real chainsaws and real food, but it comes with flyers, with recruitment pitches, with the implicit message that you owe them something now.
Progressive narratives offer systemic blame and moral capital. “Your suffering is because of structural oppression. Join our movement, adopt our framework, and we’ll fight for you.”
It’s real advocacy and real resources, but it comes with expectations. You’ll perform the right kind of victimhood. You’ll stay within the approved narrative. You won’t question the people who claim to speak for you.
Governments and NGOs offer official channels with strings attached. Bureaucracy, means testing, coordination requirements, political priorities.
The help is real but slow, conditional, and often inadequate. Which is why the other groups get in first.
Social media supercharges all of it. Suffering becomes content. The groups that document their aid get followers, donations, and influence.
So everyone films everything, and the marketplace of suffering becomes a marketplace of attention.
The losers? Depoliticized help. Aid that doesn’t come with an ideology. Mutual aid that builds capability instead of dependency.
And the people who are actually suffering, who just want their homes rebuilt and their lives back, without having to adopt anyone’s worldview to get it.
Why It Works Across Ideologies
Humans are wired for compassion toward vulnerability. It’s an evolutionary adaptation. We’re social animals, and caring for the weak and injured helped our ancestors survive.
But that wiring is a mismatch in the digital age. We’re not responding to the person in front of us anymore. We’re responding to curated images, to performed suffering, to narratives designed to trigger our protective instincts at scale.
Psychology research on competitive victimhood shows that it fosters entitlement and narrative one-upmanship. Groups don’t just claim they’re suffering. They claim they’re suffering more than other groups, that their pain is more legitimate, that they deserve more sympathy and resources.
It becomes a race to the bottom, where the most vulnerable-seeming group wins the most attention and power.
The incentives align perfectly across all sides. Attention is currency. Funding follows attention. Power follows funding. Loyalty follows aid.
Every group has discovered that vulnerability narratives work. So everyone does it.
The risks are enormous. It erodes trust in genuine aid. It fosters cynicism. People start assuming everyone’s grifting, that all charity is performative, that no one actually cares.
It diverts resources from root fixes, building local resilience, strengthening civil society, addressing the conditions that create vulnerability in the first place. And it normalizes chaos. When conspiracy theories complicate disaster response, when ideological groups compete with official channels, when aid becomes a weapon in culture wars, the actual work of helping people gets harder.
Power Vulnerability vs. Genuine Vulnerability
Not all vulnerability is the same.
There’s a difference between power vulnerability and genuine vulnerability. Understanding that difference is the key to breaking out of this cycle.
Power vulnerability is exposure done for attention, influence, likes, money, control, without personal responsibility. It’s performing trauma for engagement. It’s leveraging your victim status to escape accountability.
It’s claiming you can’t be held to the same standards as everyone else because of what was done to you or your group.
You see it everywhere. Social media influencers who monetize their mental health struggles, turning breakdowns into content, farming sympathy for clicks.
Ideological actors who claim victimhood while engaging in the very discrimination they claim to oppose. Like the rhetorical move where some frame anti-white discrimination as justified payback for historical oppression, claiming “you can’t be racist against whites” while engaging in exactly that behavior, using historical grievance as a shield against accountability for present-day actions.
Victimization comes from the outside. Victimhood comes from within. - Edith Eger, Holocaust Survivor
Groups that leverage vulnerability narratives to escape scrutiny or consequences, demanding immunity from criticism because they’ve suffered.
Power vulnerability says: “I’ve been hurt, so I get to hurt others. I’ve been oppressed, so I can’t be oppressive. My pain gives me power, and that power means I don’t have to take responsibility for my actions.”
It’s a trap. It keeps you stuck in victimhood forever. The moment you stop being a victim, you lose your power.
So you have to keep finding new ways to be oppressed, new grievances to perform, new reasons why you can’t be held accountable. It’s a perpetual motion machine of resentment and entitlement.
Genuine vulnerability, on the other hand, is exposure done for trust, connection, and growth, with personal responsibility.
Real vulnerability requires accountability for your own actions. It means being willing to be changed by connection, not just demanding that others change for you. It means no immunity from criticism based on victim status. It means recognizing that victimhood narratives can become weapons, and choosing not to wield them that way. It means taking responsibility for how you treat others even as you heal from how you’ve been treated.
Genuine vulnerability says: “I’ve been hurt, and I’m working through it. I’m going to be honest about my struggles, but I’m not going to use them as an excuse to harm others or escape consequences. I’m going to take responsibility for my healing and for my actions going forward.”
It’s harder. It requires more courage. You’re exposing yourself without the armor of moral superiority, without the shield of victimhood, without the guarantee that people will give you what you want just because you’ve suffered.
But it’s the only kind of vulnerability that actually builds community. The only kind that leads to real growth. The only kind that breaks the cycle instead of perpetuating it.
When you practice genuine vulnerability, you’re not competing for who’s suffered most. You’re not leveraging your pain for power. You’re sharing your experience to build connection, to help others, to grow together. You’re taking responsibility for your healing instead of demanding that the world heal you. You’re refusing to let your victimhood define you forever.
And that’s the threat to the whole system. If people start choosing genuine vulnerability over power vulnerability, the marketplace of suffering collapses. The groups that trade in victimhood narratives lose their power. The elites who position themselves as protectors lose their leverage. The whole attention-and-support economy that runs on performed pain stops working.
Breaking the Cycle
Here’s how to opt out:
- Reject perpetual victim status. Choose genuine vulnerability with responsibility. Build voluntary mutual aid based on actual connection rather than power plays.
- Be honest about harm without weaponizing it. Share your struggles without performing them for attention. Don’t use your pain as a weapon against others or as a shield from accountability.
- Help others without ideological strings. Offer aid that builds capability instead of dependency. Teach people to rebuild their own homes instead of making them reliant on your group for survival.
- Call out power vulnerability on all sides. When white nationalists use disaster aid as a recruitment tool, call it out. When progressive movements claim immunity from criticism because of historical oppression, call it out. When anyone leverages suffering for power without taking responsibility, call it out.
- Practice genuine vulnerability yourself. Take responsibility for your healing and your actions. Build real connections based on trust instead of transactions based on victimhood.
- Support decentralized, non-ideological help. Prioritize mutual aid networks that focus on effectiveness over optics, that build local resilience instead of creating dependency on distant saviors.
The groups that exploit vulnerability, whether they’re neo-Nazis with chainsaws or activists with hashtags, are counting on you staying stuck in the game. They’re counting on you believing that vulnerability equals power, that suffering gives you moral authority, that you can’t be held accountable because of what’s been done to you.
But you can choose differently. You can choose genuine vulnerability over power vulnerability. You can choose responsibility over resentment. You can choose to build instead of compete, to connect instead of perform, to heal instead of weaponize.
Stop playing the game. Choose genuine vulnerability. Take responsibility. Build real connections. And watch the marketplace of suffering lose its power over you.
Thanks for reading The Freeman Wire! Enjoyed this article? Feel free to share it!
P.S. This article was published a year ago today (almost).
Jordan Blackwood
